KSCommons

Assessing Alternatives: Chemical Content Analysis Of Biodiesel Vs. Diesel Fuel Emissions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ethan Hotchkiss
dc.contributor.author Niko Brown
dc.contributor.author Michael Cavacas
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-23T20:22:06Z
dc.date.available 2018-01-23T20:22:06Z
dc.date.issued 04/11/2015
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12088/7582
dc.description dc.description
dc.description.abstract With climate change an increasing concern, the push towards alternative energy sources from fossil fuels is very strong. Biodiesel fuel is one such alternative; however, it is important to consider that the combustion of biodiesel may contain toxic and harmful organic compounds that are emitted into the atmosphere. For this study, airborne particulate matter was collected on filters over a ten-day period for both diesel and biodiesel fuels at two workspace locations within the Keene Recycling Center. Collected particulate matter was categorized by size using multiple filters within an impactor device. Filters were analyzed for the presence of 61 different organic compounds using gas chromatography mass spectrometry with high sensitivity. Results will be presented that compare the differences in chemical content found in the emissions from the two fuels and examine these chemical differences with specific ranges of particulate matter size.
dc.description.sponsorship James Kraly and Nora Traviss
dc.language.iso en_US
dc.publisher Keene State College
dc.subject Chemistry
dc.subject Environmental Sciences
dc.title Assessing Alternatives: Chemical Content Analysis Of Biodiesel Vs. Diesel Fuel Emissions
dc.type Presentation


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Browse

My Account